President-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic who spreads medical disinformation and conspiracy theories, to go the Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS) alarmed public well being consultants who say that Kennedy’s potential affirmation might have dire penalties for the state of well being and science in America.
“I can’t consider a darker day for public well being and science itself than the election of Donald Trump and the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as secretary of well being,” says Lawrence Gostin, director of Georgetown College’s O’Neill Institute for Nationwide and World Well being Regulation.
“To say that RFK Jr. is unqualified is a substantial understatement,” he continues. “The minimal qualification for being the top of the Division of Well being and Human Providers is constancy to science and scientific proof, and he spent his total profession fomenting mistrust in public well being and undermining science at each step of the best way.”
If confirmed by the Senate, Kennedy would have sway over well being companies just like the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) that fall underneath the purview of HHS. Kennedy, who endorsed Trump within the 2024 election after ending his personal longshot presidential marketing campaign as an unbiased, has promoted a plan to “Make America Wholesome Once more,” which incorporates objectives like reversing “an epidemic of continual illness,” banning sure meals components and chemical substances, and cleansing up “poisonous chemical substances from our air, water, and soil.”
However Kennedy, 70, has confronted blowback for spreading medical disinformation. He has falsely claimed that vaccines trigger autism, which has been debunked by years of scientific analysis proving vaccines are secure and efficient. He’s claimed that including fluoride to the water provide—a secure and long-standing observe that protects oral well being—is linked to IQ loss, bone most cancers, and extra, and has stated he would cease the observe. He’s accused the FDA of “aggressive suppression” of uncooked milk; the FDA doesn’t order individuals to not drink uncooked milk, however cautions that uncooked milk can comprise harmful micro organism, together with E. coli and listeria, which might result in sicknesses and even demise (well being authorities have additionally been advising the general public to keep away from consuming uncooked milk in the course of the fowl flu outbreak, because the virus can survive in it).
Learn Extra: What Donald Trump’s Win May Imply for Vaccines
For the reason that election, Kennedy has stated that he and the Trump Administration wouldn’t take vaccines off the market, however public well being consultants are involved that he would appoint officers within the FDA or CDC who share his debunked anti-vaccine views and will attempt to sluggish, prohibit, or revoke vaccine approvals. Gostin says there are “guardrails” in place that will stop Kennedy from passing excessive insurance policies—as an example, the top of HHS wouldn’t have the ability to ban vaccinations or vaccination mandates, since these public well being powers are left as much as state or native officers. If the FDA tried to withdraw approval of a vaccine with out scientific justification, Gostin says he expects that that argument wouldn’t maintain up in court docket.
Even so, Gostin says he believes Kennedy “might do huge harm” in the case of vaccine coverage within the U.S. He worries that HHS might “cherry decide” information that casts doubt on the protection and effectiveness of vaccines, which might affect state and native officers and sow public mistrust. Businesses just like the FDA and CDC “set the scientific gold commonplace for public well being suggestions,” and in the event that they launch false or deceptive info, Gostin worries “it’ll poison the effectively of public opinion and no person will know who to belief.” And that would result in fewer individuals getting vaccinated and “an explosion” of vaccine-preventable illnesses, reminiscent of measles, mumps, and rubella, Gostin says.
“You shouldn’t have any individual who’s a vaccine denier and science skeptic as head of the nation’s most venerable scientific companies,” Gostin says. “He’s proven that, on an enormous vary of public well being points, he takes the place outdoors the scientific mainstream, that he peddles mis- and disinformation, and that he’s to not be trusted with the well being and security of Individuals.”
Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Training Middle at Youngsters’s Hospital of Philadelphia who has served on CDC and FDA vaccine advisory committees, says he was “sickened” by the information of Kennedy being nominated for the place. He compares Kennedy being thought-about for the function to “having any individual who doesn’t consider in gravity being the top of NASA.” He criticizes Kennedy for beforehand indicating that he would deprioritize infectious illnesses as a analysis focus on the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH).
“We’re experiencing an H5N1 [bird flu] outbreak proper now, and so if we take away infectious illness funding—then what? I’m attempting to make it make sense,” says Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist and founding father of the publication Your Native Epidemiologist.
Kennedy will face an uphill battle to win Senate affirmation. However Offit says the nomination alone is a regarding illustration of an absence of belief in science. Specialists fear that Kennedy might proceed to unfold medical misinformation as the top of HHS—and that many individuals will consider it.
“There’s probability that falsehoods and rumors can be broadcast from probably the most highly effective workplace within the nation, and I feel this can drive confusion, nervousness, and questions which are going to have a direct unfavourable influence on Individuals who genuinely have good questions and are concerned with making evidence-based well being selections,” Jetelina says. “My greatest concern is the disinformation that can be amplified—that’s now not on the fringes, however it’ll turn out to be mainstream.”
Whereas many public well being consultants worry Kennedy’s stances on vaccines and infectious illnesses, some are extra optimistic about his positions on meals and diet. On his web site, Kennedy guarantees to “ban the a whole bunch of meals components and chemical substances that different international locations have already prohibited” and “change rules, analysis matters, and subsidies to scale back the dominance of ultra-processed meals.” Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a heart specialist and director of the Meals Is Drugs Institute at Tufts College, says Kennedy’s give attention to meals and diet is “probably very highly effective to lastly have some actual, significant change on this nation to handle our nationwide diet disaster.” Whereas different consultants acknowledge that meals and diet do want reform, they solid doubt on whether or not Kennedy would accomplish that successfully, and stress the menace that he would pose to different areas of well being, together with vaccines.
“I’m going to be hopeful and be optimistic and never pre-judge what RFK Jr. would possibly do as a Cupboard secretary and head of a significant company based mostly on what he’s achieved and stated prior to now,” Mozaffarian says. “I hope and assume he’s going to make use of one of the best science to maneuver ahead.”
Nonetheless, a day after Trump introduced the nomination, most public well being consultants are dismayed about what Kennedy’s management at HHS might convey. “Briefly, he’s not going to make use of science, and he’s not going to do the exhausting work to make America wholesome once more,” Gostin says. “In reality, I feel he’s going to make America ever extra sick and distrustful of public well being.”